
( First Published IN 1996 )
by
Dale E. Cripps
ecent discussions around the world are focused to non-HDTV aspects of the DTV standard (s) and transition. Cost, rather than performance, is directing the thinking of many decision makers. The appeal to the all-important consumer may be lost with this compromise in quality. As a result a most dangerous phase of the digital transition has arrived.
Considering Costs--Macro or Micro? While cost is important, the macro cost must also be considered. The most costly decision is one which minimizes quality of the new digital signal in order to contain early transition costs. While appealing to traditional signal providers such a strategy cannot excite the consumers. Without the consumer engaged, the transition process must end poorly. Pioneering HDTV Signals The pioneering HDTV signal provider must have programming fitted to the new medium if all potential attraction to the new service is to be achieved. Both Hollywood productions and national and international events offer this program fit. Investors in a pioneering signal provider will be those seeking to minimize their own digital transition cost. Broadcasters, cable, DBS services, and manufacturers are the most likely to join in this for-profit venture. Already negative results are occurring as confused buyers are postponing decisions to acquire HDTV production and receiving equipment until clarity is brought to the commercial launching of the industry. Proposal Dale Cripps |